![Mac Mac](https://permadi.com/wordpress2/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/acactivecontent.gif)
Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places don’t talk about):
ACRunActiveContent.js (1) ActiveContentDropDown.js (1) Chrome browser (1) DW 8.0.2 (1) Dreamweaver MX2004 (1) Dreaweaver 8 (1) Extra space at the top (1) Extra top space (1) GET method (1) Google CSE (1) Google Chrome (1) Layout Problems (1) Mac (1) Mac Style Menu (1) Navigation Guide (1) POST method (1) Scripts/ACRunActiveContent.js (1) W3C.
- SWFObject degrades gracefully. If flash isn’t detected, the “flashcontent” div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code that’s far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesn’t even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a <noscript> content area, but in that case you’re limited to only having a replacement <img> instead of full-blown replacement content.
- SWFObject entails terser code. When using SFWObject, you’re only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObject’s code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
- SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in. As it stands, Macromedia’s implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedia’s AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the <embed> object – if that’s not ad hoc, I don’t know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
- And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
- Dec 24, 2013 Addeddate 2013-12-24 07:05:37 Identifier ACRunActiveContent Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t6qz4pg4m Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.4.2.
- Free download page for Project GeAnn's ACRunActiveContent.js.GeAnn is a crowdsourcing-powered Web game for collecting document relevance judgements. Crowdsourcing for academic and industrial purposes often faces issues of quality control and worker motiva.
- Ac Runactivecontent Js Free Download Nexus Torrent Mac Simple Power Of Attorney Forms Free Printable Theme Song Downloads Free Windows 2008 R2 Sp2 Teac Usb Floppy Drive Driver Free Computer Debugging Programs Paltalk Messenger Download Free Socom 2.
![Ac run active content js Ac run active content js](https://docsplayer.com/docs-images/101/151453278/images/112-0.jpg)
Some caveats:
- SWFObject doesn’t work if/when javascript is disabled. I personally consider this a small point, but it’s still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedia’s approach doesn’t suffer this setback given their use of <noscript>.
EXAMPLE Motogp 08 pc full version.
![Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0284/4190/3182/products/APPLE_PLEACH_OG_-_FRUITS_MOCKUP_700x_1800x1800_8af39bcc-e240-4ac9-abdd-ddbf5847724a_580x.jpg?v=1598603497)
Free Mac Computer
Anyone familiar with Macromedia’s suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical:
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code:
![Ac_runactivecontent js free mac font Ac_runactivecontent js free mac font](https://746338e60e3b28c64115-e303cacf358c9c5742bccdd1bb57ed7b.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/WP0AC2A90JS177058/e863921119930c8a58c6e6925dcd90f5.jpg)
Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places don’t talk about):
ACRunActiveContent.js (1) ActiveContentDropDown.js (1) Chrome browser (1) DW 8.0.2 (1) Dreamweaver MX2004 (1) Dreaweaver 8 (1) Extra space at the top (1) Extra top space (1) GET method (1) Google CSE (1) Google Chrome (1) Layout Problems (1) Mac (1) Mac Style Menu (1) Navigation Guide (1) POST method (1) Scripts/ACRunActiveContent.js (1) W3C.
- SWFObject degrades gracefully. If flash isn’t detected, the “flashcontent” div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code that’s far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesn’t even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a <noscript> content area, but in that case you’re limited to only having a replacement <img> instead of full-blown replacement content.
- SWFObject entails terser code. When using SFWObject, you’re only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObject’s code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
- SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in. As it stands, Macromedia’s implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedia’s AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedia’s AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the <embed> object – if that’s not ad hoc, I don’t know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
- And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
- Dec 24, 2013 Addeddate 2013-12-24 07:05:37 Identifier ACRunActiveContent Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t6qz4pg4m Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.4.2.
- Free download page for Project GeAnn's ACRunActiveContent.js.GeAnn is a crowdsourcing-powered Web game for collecting document relevance judgements. Crowdsourcing for academic and industrial purposes often faces issues of quality control and worker motiva.
- Ac Runactivecontent Js Free Download Nexus Torrent Mac Simple Power Of Attorney Forms Free Printable Theme Song Downloads Free Windows 2008 R2 Sp2 Teac Usb Floppy Drive Driver Free Computer Debugging Programs Paltalk Messenger Download Free Socom 2.
Some caveats:
- SWFObject doesn’t work if/when javascript is disabled. I personally consider this a small point, but it’s still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedia’s approach doesn’t suffer this setback given their use of <noscript>.
EXAMPLE Motogp 08 pc full version.
Free Mac Computer
Anyone familiar with Macromedia’s suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical:
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code:
Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Os
their flash player download page. SWFObject has nothing to do with that kind
of feature. Nor does Express Install.
EI is useful for upgrading someone's older flash player to a new version,
inline automatically inside the browser. It requires a browser restart, but
gracefully takes the user back to the same url/page after restart. Again,
it's only helpful for getting an existing install of flash upgraded, not the
initial install.
SWFObject has effective DETECTION logic for all the above cases, meaning it
can tell you exactly what version, if any, they have, and let you choose
what your page should do base on that. AC_xxx doesn't have that. For
instance, you could say 'if they have no flash, show them an image, if they
have flash 8+ show them A.swf, and if they have flash 10+, show them B.swf'.
Again, impossible (or nearly so) with AC_xxx methods.
SWFObject also provides effective means (via static publishing) of doing
standards-compliant markup with no javascript support required for flash
embedding. It gracefully enhances if javascript is in place by doing version
checks, EI, etc, but the flash is there and embedded, cross-browser, even if
no JS is present. Again, not something AC_xxx does as well, and certainly
not as standards-compliant.
SWFObject also has dynamic publishing, which means at any time of the life
of a page, like in response to user actions or Ajax responses or whatever,
you can dynamically embed a SWF on-the-fly into an existing page. This is
incredibly powerful for RIA's and other complex web pages and web apps.
AC_xxx cannot do it.
SWFObject is also open-source, and has a vibrant support community and tens
(or dare I say hundreds) of thousands of sites using it. Adobe's script on
the other hand has been deprecated even by them, and had very little
official support even when it was their script of choice. Starting with CS4
and going forward, Adobe chose to standardize on SWFObject 2.x, which means
it's getting embedded support in all their authoring products which produce
flash markup. Keep using AC_xxx and you'll be diverging from Adobe's
standards now. Now that is use-at-your-own-risk.
SWFObject has a good selection of companion projects/libraries/scripts which
use, extend, and improve on the core, and cover just about any standard (and
even most exotic) scenarios you could imagine with SWF embedding. AC_xxx was
pretty narrow and limited in its use cases, and pretty inflexible to
extension/adjustment.
-----------------
As for the activeX warning.. this shouldn't be happening, even on IE8
(default). It's either a case of non-default stricter settings (likely), or
possibly a corrupt player install (also unfortunately quite possible).
Here's one such thread on it:
https://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.internetexplorer.beta&tid=8eabe917-2c0e-42de-98b1-afdd25857fa1&cat=&lang=&cr=&sloc=&p=1
In any case, SWFObject's test suite completely passes, with no errors or
warnings, in IE8 (both winXP and Vista). I'd be curious to see if you get
those warnings in YOUR browser by visiting our test pages, any of the links
on here: http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/test_suite If so, it's
something wrong with your system. We can help troubleshoot and get it
corrected, if you want.
If you change your mind and want to join the movement of SWFObject, we'd
love to have you and help with any issues you have. If you continue to make
your judgments based on a cursory first glance and misinformation, I wish
you the best of luck in the AC_xxx wild-wild-west. :)
--Kyle
--------------------------------------------------
From: 'hendra' <hendra..@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:28 AM
To: 'SWFObject' <swfo..@googlegroups.com>
Subject: back to AC_RunActiveContent.js